Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS

TMS235-The-Angry-Patient

In this episode, we cover:

  • Why trying to “win” an argument with an angry patient almost always costs you the relationship.
  • Exact phrases to use when a patient is furious about wait times, bills, or feeling dismissed.
  • The five-step reset for de-escalating anger: Listen, Acknowledge, Clarify, Respond, Follow through.
  • How to respond when a patient threatens to sue or leave a scathing online review—without violating privacy rules.
  • The three sentences every staff member should know to lower the temperature and reopen communication.

Key Takeaway Quote:

“Your goal is not to win the argument. Your goal is to understand the experience. Because you can be technically correct and still completely lose the patient.” – Dr. Barbara Hales

Connect with Barbara Hales: 

 

TRANSCRIPT

Stop Trying to Win — Understand the Angry Patient

Dr. Barbara Hales 0:06

Your patient is furious, and unfortunately, they have Wi-Fi. Hello, everyone, and welcome back to Marketing Tips for Doctors. In our first episode, we talked about trust and the transparency paradox. We challenged the old belief that when something goes wrong, saying less always protects the physician. Then we tackled one of the hardest questions a patient can ask: “Doctor, was this your fault? And we talked about what physicians can actually say when they don’t yet have all the answers. Today we’re taking the next step because sometimes the patient isn’t calmly asking questions. Sometimes they’re angry, really, really angry. They’re angry about the bill. They’re angry because they waited an hour and 15 minutes to see you. They’re angry because nobody returned their call. They’re angry because you didn’t send their prescription to the pharmacy. They’re angry because they think you didn’t listen to them, or they’re angry because the outcome wasn’t what they expected, and now they’re standing at your front desk saying those words everyone in the office dreads. I’m going to leave you a terrible review. What happens next may determine whether you lose a patient, receive a one-star review, damage your reputation, or actually strengthen the relationship. So grab your coffee because today we’re talking about the angry patient, and I’m going to give you actual words to use. First, stop trying to win. Here’s the first thing I want you to remember: your goal is not to win the argument. I know sometimes the patient is wrong, completely wrong. They arrived 25 minutes late, and they’re furious because they had to wait. They didn’t follow the instructions you gave them. The office called three times, and they didn’t return the calls. The charge they’re screaming about is clearly explained in the paperwork they signed. You have facts. You have documentation. You may even have witnesses. And every cell in your body wants to say, actually, be careful, because you can win the argument and still lose the patient. And now that patient has a smartphone, being technically correct does not necessarily repair an emotional experience. Before you correct the facts, you need to understand what the patient believes happened. The waiting room. Let’s imagine a patient named Susan. Susan has a 10 o’clock appointment. At 11 o5′ she’s still sitting in the waiting room. Nobody has told her why. She finally walks up to the receptionist and says, “This is ridiculous. My time matters too. The receptionist answers, “The doctor had an emergency. We’re doing the best we can now. Is that true? Probably. Is it helpful? Not particularly, because what Susan hears is, “Your inconvenience doesn’t matter because we have a good excuse. Then the receptionist makes it worse. Would you like to reschedule? Oh boy, Susan has already rearranged her morning, driven to the office, and waited more than an hour. Now we’re suggesting she do it all again. Imagine instead that someone had gone into the waiting room 30 minutes earlier and said, “Dr. Smith had an emergency this morning, and we’re running behind. I’m really sorry we didn’t tell you sooner. Right now, we’re estimating another 30-minute wait. I can give you some options if that doesn’t work for you. Same delay, same doctor, same emergency, completely different experience. What changed? Not the problem, the communication. Sometimes you cannot fix what’s making the patient angry, but you can fix how they’re experiencing it. Don’t say “calm down. Here’s a phrase I’d like to banish from every medical office. You need to calm down. Has that sentence ever calmed anyone down? Imagine your spouse saying it to you during an argument. How’s that going to work out? Probably not well. “ Calm down” communicates that your emotional reaction is the problem. Instead, try. I can see that you’re upset. Tell me what happened. Then stop talking. This is harder than it sounds. Doctors are problem solvers. While the patient is speaking, our brains are already generating solutions. But an angry person who doesn’t feel heard usually doesn’t get less angry because you interrupted them with a solution. Let them finish. You may discover that what they’re actually angry about isn’t what you assumed. Story number two: The $300 bill. Let’s meet Robert. Robert receives a $300 bill he wasn’t expecting. He calls the practice, furious. I was told insurance covered this. The staff member responds, “You need to call your insurance company. That’s your deductible.

Listen, Acknowledge, Clarify, Respond, and Follow Through

Dr. Barbara Hales 6:43

That may be factually correct, but Robert doesn’t hear. Here’s an explanation. He hears, not our problem. So he asks for the office manager. Now he’s angrier. By the time the office manager gets on the phone, Robert says this practice is a scam. Here’s where things can go badly very quickly. The office manager can defend the practice. We are absolutely not a scam. Or she can say, I can hear how frustrating it was to receive a bill you weren’t expecting. Let’s look at what happened together. Notice something important. She didn’t say the bill was wrong. She didn’t promise to waive it. She did not blame the insurance company. She acknowledged the problem and offered to investigate it. Then she can say, “Let me pull up your account so I can explain exactly where this charge came from. Now we’re moving from confrontation to problem-solving, and that phrase, “Let’s look at this together, is incredibly powerful. Suddenly, it’s no longer patient versus practice. It’s patient and practice versus problem. That’s where you want to be. The five-step reset. So let’s make this practical. When an angry patient is in front of you, remember five steps: one, listen. Don’t interrupt unless there’s a safety issue. Let the patient tell you what happened. Two, acknowledge. You don’t have to agree with every accusation. You can say, “I understand why that would be frustrating, or “I can see why you’re upset. Three, clarify. Ask what concerns you most right now. That question is gold, because the answer may surprise you. Four, respond now and only now. Explain what you know. Keep it simple. No defensive speech. No 10-minute explanation of office policy. Five. Follow through. If you say you’ll call tomorrow, call tomorrow. If you say someone will investigate. Make sure somebody investigates, because nothing reignites anger faster than a broken promise. But what if the patient is wrong? Now we’re getting to the fun part. What if the patient is absolutely, positively wrong? Let’s say a patient tells you Nobody ever told me I needed this follow-up test. You look at the chart; it’s documented. You discussed it. Your nurse discussed it. The portal message was sent. The patient even replied to. Message; your temptation is to say, ” Actually, we told you three times, technically correct, terrible opening. Try this instead. I can see there was a disconnect somewhere because you didn’t leave understanding that the follow-up was necessary. Let’s go through what happened and make sure we’re clear about what you need now. Does that mean you’re accepting blame? No. It means you’re prioritizing the patient’s care over proving you’re right. You can review the documentation afterward, but first solve the problem that’s in front of you. Story number three: the patient who felt dismissed. Now let’s talk about something even more personal. A patient we’ll call Diane comes in with fatigue, headaches, and difficulty sleeping. The physician evaluates her, orders appropriate tests, and finds nothing alarming. He tells her everything looks fine. He thinks he’s giving her good news. Diane hears There’s nothing wrong with you. She leaves furious. Later, she writes, “The doctor didn’t listen to me and dismissed all my symptoms. Now, imagine the physician reading that review. His immediate reaction might be, “That’s completely unfair. I spent 30 minutes with her. I ordered tests, and he may be right, but remember something: intent and experience are not always the same thing. He meant to reassure her; she felt dismissed. What if he had said The good news is that the testing we’ve done so far has not shown anything dangerous, but I know you’re still having these symptoms, and I don’t want you to think I’m dismissing them. Let’s talk about what we do next. Same test results, different experience. Sometimes the sentence you add at the end changes everything. When the patient says, “I’m going to sue you, now let’s tackle the sentence that makes everyone’s stomach drop. I’m going to sue you. This is not the moment to say, “Go ahead, please don’t say that. It’s also not the time to debate the merits of a potential lawsuit. Once a patient threatens legal action, follow your organization’s policies and notify the appropriate risk management or malpractice professionals. But in the moment, you can still remain calm. You might say, “I can hear how upset you are.

Handling Lawsuits, Online Reviews, and Boundaries

Dr. Barbara Hales 13:05

I want to make sure your concerns are taken seriously, and I’ll make sure the appropriate people are aware of them. Don’t argue. Don’t threaten. Don’t promise outcomes, and don’t suddenly become a robot. Professional doesn’t have to mean cold. And then there’s the online review. Now we arrive at the Wi-Fi. The patient says, “Everyone is going to hear about this. Here’s what I don’t want you to do. Don’t say If you post something false, we’ll respond. Don’t say you can’t write that, and please don’t start negotiating for five stars while the person is still furious. Your objective is to address the underlying complaint because many negative reviews begin long before somebody opens Google. They begin with the feeling nobody listened to me. If you can address that feeling before the patient leaves your office, you may prevent the conflict from escalating, not because you’re manipulating them into avoiding a bad review, but because you’re actually resolving the problem. That’s reputation management at its best. What if the review is already online? Now suppose you’re too late. You wake up Monday morning, and there it is: one star, and it’s long, very long. Your name is mentioned seven times. Your staff is furious, and you desperately want to respond. That’s not what happened. Don’t, at least not immediately, because there’s another person. Reading that exchange, actually, there may be hundreds of them. Your future patients-they’re not only judging the angry reviewer; they’re judging you. Because healthcare information is protected, your public response also has privacy considerations. You cannot simply publish details from someone’s medical record to prove that you are right. So your public response needs to remain professional and protect patient privacy. Something along the lines of, “We’re sorry to hear that you are unhappy with your experience. We take concerns seriously and would welcome the opportunity to speak with you directly. Please contact our office so we can discuss this further. Simple, professional. No diagnosis, no treatment details, no argument. Then take the conversation offline. Remember, your response isn’t only for the person who wrote the review; it’s for every prospective patient who reads it later. They’re asking themselves, “How does this doctor behave when somebody is unhappy? Show them when anger crosses the line now. I want to make something very clear: empathy does not mean tolerating abuse. A patient can be angry, complain, or disagree with you, but threatening, discriminatory, abusive, or dangerous behavior is different. Your staff deserves a safe workplace, so there is absolutely a point where you may need to say, “I want to help resolve this, but I can’t continue the conversation while you’re speaking to my staff that way. If we could speak respectfully, I’m happy to continue. That’s not being uncaring. That’s having boundaries. And if there’s a genuine safety threat, follow your office safety procedures. You can have empathy and boundaries at the same time. The three sentences I want your staff to know. If I were training a medical office tomorrow, I’d want every staff member to know these three sentences. Tell me what happened. I can understand why you’re frustrated. Let’s see what we can do next. Notice what isn’t there. You’re wrong. That’s our policy. There’s nothing I can do. You need to call your insurance company. You’ll have to speak to someone else. Those phrases shut conversations down. The three phrases I gave you open conversations up, and sometimes that’s all you need to lower the temperature enough to solve the actual problem. Now here’s where this all comes back to marketing tips for doctors. Doctors often think reputation management means getting more five-star reviews. Respond to Google reviews. Improve your website. Post on social media. Yes, those things matter. But real reputation management happens before the review is ever written. It happens at the front desk; it happens on the telephone. It happens when you’re running an hour behind. It happens when there’s a billing problem. It happens when a patient feels ignored, and it happens when something goes wrong. Every one of those moments gives your practice an opportunity- not an opportunity to manipulate the patient, but an opportunity to show them who you are, because your brand isn’t what your website says about you.

Your Brand Is What Patients Say About You

Dr. Barbara Hales 19:12

Your brand is what patients say about you after they’ve experienced you, and sometimes the patient who was initially the angriest becomes the patient who tells everyone there was a problem, but you should have seen how they handled it. That’s powerful. Not because everything went perfectly, because it didn’t. Trust was tested, and the practice responded. One last thing. So the next time an angry patient is standing in front of you, remember: don’t try to win. Try to understand. Listen before you explain. Acknowledging emotion without agreeing to something that isn’t true doesn’t work. Find out what the patient actually wants resolved. Explain what happens next, and if you promise to follow up, follow up, because sometimes the difference between a furious patient and a loyal patient isn’t whether something went wrong. It’s what happened after it went wrong. And yes, sometimes that difference happens within a few minutes of them getting home. Sit down with their phone and discover they have Wi-Fi. That is the time you can make a difference. Now we’ve spent three episodes talking about what happens when trust is tested, but there’s another question we haven’t addressed: Can you build that trust before anything ever goes wrong? Absolutely, and that’s what we’ll talk about next, because the strongest physician-patient relationships don’t begin in crisis; they’re built long before one happens. If you’ve been enjoying this series, subscribe to Marketing Tips for Doctors and share this episode with another physician or practice manager. Remember your one tweak from greatness.